Pastime (Leica SL + 50mm Summilux-SL)

June 8, 2017

I love nothing more then to walk through my neighbourhood taking photos. I’d love it a bit more if the 50SL were lighter and could focus faster & closer.. But I guess I can’t have it all.
And Leica isn’t likely to send me a 75APO to test, so I guess I’ll just have to wait like everyone else. But maybe it’ll be a better walk around lens for life’s little details. I hear it focuses closer is smaller/light and that’s always a plus for a lens that one takes on walks.

Here are a few random shots of things I like to shoot that don’t really move, so I don’t have to worry so much about the AF speed of the lens.

Also yes, I like to shoot succulents. I have 100′s of images of them shot with all manner of Leica lenses. I don’t know why, I just like shooting succulents with Leicas.







A stroll through the canals.

May 25, 2017

Just playing around with the Leica SL and 50mm Summilux-SL while on a stroll with my wife Emily.
(Fun Fact: I linked the photos directly from my wife’s site because I didn’t want to upload them twice.)

pink kimono outfit 4

pink kimono outfit 1

pink kimono outfit 2

pink kimono outfit 3

pink kimono outfit 5

50 Summilux-SL f/1.4 Review (first look)

October 18, 2016  |  Review


First let me start by saying there is a discrepancy as to if this is a final production sample or not. I was told by someone I trust at Leica Germany that this was in fact a final production sample. However, I was told by a Leica employee locally that it was not final because there were going to be firmware updates for both the lens and the body (which means final hardware w/firmware updates on the way). Now, I’ve also seen sample images from a friends 50SL (how he got one is beyond my knowledge, and a moot point). His copy of the lens actually seems worse from the sample photos he sent me (it has that infamous onion ring bokeh and is much more flat/dull). He claims it is definitely a final production sample as this is what he was told. His samples initially had me worried for the lens, but the copy I used is better from what I can tell. So who knows what’s going on! 

A hard truth: There is no bad lens in this day and age. These days, it’s more a question of if one lens is worth the price premium over another. Some M lenses are so gorgeous that I’d fight tooth and nail to defend their worth. But others leave me scratching my head as to why they cost so much. The cameras these lenses are put on are also a factor – I love the M240-P sensor and I don’t like the SL sensor. 

I wouldn’t defend the 50 Summilux-SL as savagely as I’d defend some M lenses. But I’ll write my take on it, show some images, and let you guys be the judge if it’s worth the price. But at $5,295 USD, I’d hope you’ll read a lot more reviews and look at a lot more samples then just mine.

First impressions: It’s big, but not as heavy as I’d have thought. It doesn’t balance well on the SL for an all-day-walk-around prime, but it’s headed in the right direction. The recently announced Summicron line should be just right on the SL body. I also tried to use the grip, but something about it just bothered me with the 50SL. If I had the 90-280 or even the 24-90 on instead, I might have liked using the grip.
iPhone shot to show size in hand: in-hand

Distortion control: This lens has barrel distortion. I would have thought for the size – and fact that Leica calls it a “reference lens” – the designers? engineers? wouldn’t have resorted to digital corrections. But they have. On the upside, if you don’t know what I’m talking about then you’ll probably never notice the barrel distortion. Mouse over the photo below to see it with and without Leica’s baked-in corrections.
(not as bad as the Q, but strange considering the focal length).
Unedited DNGs converted to jpg and resized:

An edited version for fun:

Another sample of distortion (no mouse over, you get the idea):
The Bends

Corner performance: I can’t really tell. Between the distortion control and my inability to shoot brick walls perfectly straight on, I just can’t tell. My take is that the corners are soft wide open and stay soft stopped down quite a bit (f/5.6). BUT I didn’t break out the tools and measure if the wall was straight and if the camera was perfectly parallel. I also am looking at the shots before digital corrections. Other testers might not do that.
For what it’s worth, I have a folder full of DNGs of various distances and f/stops. I can post this if someone is REALLY interested. (Nothing at infinity as I don’t know how one shoots infinity in a city centre, and I don’t feel like paying a cover charge to go to the MBS rooftop pool.)

Vignetting: It’s bad at f/1.4 but by f/2 it’s so-so. By f/4 it’s almost gone. This isn’t an issue for me personally, as I’m mostly shooting portraits and a bit of vignetting (the natural type) can actually aid in drawing the eye to my usually-central subject. 
@ f/1.4: f/1.4
@ f/2: f/2.0
@ f/2.8: f/2.8
@ f/4: f/4.0

Flare control: There’s some good and some bad. The good is that when you see flare, it’s pretty. The bad is that it can create a hazy veil much like the 75APO, leaching all the contrast out of your shot. But overall it wasn’t that easy to get this lens to flare uncontrollably. 
Random flare samples:
vanity flare

Fringing: This is where things get a bit odd. I’m not entirely convinced that this lens doesn’t have CA. I see it sometimes, and in other instances I don’t when I should. My best guess is that it’s sometimes being corrected in camera. My attempt to undo this correction hasn’t had the results I thought it would, so let’s just say that this lens has CA but it’s controlled optically. Or it’s very well hidden digitally. I’ll let someone else figure it out.
Samples anyway:

Contrast: It’s a pretty contrasty lens in certain situations, but the elements have to be aligned and the sun has to be at the right angle and so on.. Overall it has a good amount of contrast in regular shooting conditions.

AF: I’m very sad to report that the AF is pretty terrible. If anyone has the 35 Summilux-TL you’ll understand what I mean. Just image that, but worse. It hunts unpredictably with static subjects and it has a hard time locking focus on moving subjects when I’m planted in a stationary position. It’s not as slow as the S-lenses, but it’s far less sure-footed. HOPEFULLY there will be an AF update for the SL-body as well as an AF update for this lens before launch. If Fuji can do it, I’m sure Leica can too. Leica if you’re reading this.. Update the AF before launch. Because as it stands it’s a very frustrating $5,000 lens. EDIT: I was told there would be a AF update before launch. I hope Leica can deliver on this.

Magic dust… Where did it all go? Can Leica kidnap the seven dwarves and get them to dig some more up? I haven’t seen M/R rendering from any of the SL lenses. At first I thought it was a prime vs zoom thing. But after playing with the 50SL, I really just think something’s missing. (Though in all fairness it could be my dislike for the SL sensor that is clouding my judgement.) Of course this is subjective – I just figured I’d add in my thoughts. And before anyone asks how I can tell from a short period of time. It’s simple, I know what to look for. Also, I go out and shoot exactly the way I’d shoot for work/play and I judge based on prior experience. Maybe you look for different things in lenses than I do, and that’s fine. Another honest possibility could be that I’m just so used to the rendering of the 50 Summicron-APO that I don’t really like anything else anymore. Not saying I don’t like the 50SL, but I don’t like it as much as the 50APO. 

A few minor disappointments that make the lens slightly less enjoyable are:

The minimum focusing distance is really quite far. For a walk around lens I would have liked to have had a slightly closer minimum focus. It’s hard to take quirky shots of little pets and such. Maybe this is digitally limited by Leica for distortion purposes, maybe one has nothing to do with the other. Maybe it feels more like a 45mm to me, I’m not quite sure what’s going on.

I also find the lack of a focusing scale to be inconvenient. I know it’s on camera, but I just like knowing I’ve hit the closest distance via feel/sight/touch. TBH I don’t know why the manual focus ring is even on the lens. It’s so bad in use I’d have preferred they just left it out and if whatever they left out made the lens smaller, which would have been a bonus.

Overall I’m not unhappy having played with the 50 Summilux-SL a couple of times. I’m just unhappy that Leica expects us to pay so much for it. It’s better then the Sigma 50mm ART lens but it’s worse then the 55mm Otus lens. Wait. Let me rephrase that: IMHO it’s not optically as excellent as the Otus 55/1.4, so I can’t fathom why it’s big and expensive.

Will I buy this lens? Possibly, as there really isn’t an ideal alternative if I want to continue using the SL (I’m not a fan of zooms, and I can RF my M faster the I can EVF-MF my SL). Should I wait and see if the 37/75 cron lenses are better performers.. Probably. Will I wait, probably not ;)

Gallery (Random edited images):





































35 Summilux-T thoughts..

April 5, 2016  |  Random

The good news is the T system isn’t dead.

The bad news is it’s still over priced.

As far as APS-C lenses go, the 35 Summilux-T isn’t bad. And if I actually owned a T, I would seriously consider this lens. But with the soon-to-be-released S-adapter for the SL I’d rather just toss on one of my S-lenses. I’d have considered purchasing the T lens for the SL if it had faster AF, a more interesting rendering and a cheaper price.

I know Leica isn’t cheap and I’m no stranger to expensive glass, but I believe you should get what you pay for. And at $2,400 USD (at the time of writing this) I’d have expected the lens to have had more character, or some other magical spark that distinguished it from the Sony/Zeiss/Fuji APS-C lenses out there.

Here are a few quick shots wide open on the SL:
(My wife wasn’t with me on that particular outing, so I had to ask a nice gentleman if I could take his portrait)




Haw Par Villa (Testing the new Leica SL)

December 1, 2015  |  Walks

I’ve frequently driven by Haw Par Villa on my way to various client meetings, the wholesale market…even when satisfying late night durian cravings. But in the 10 years I’ve known about its existence, I’ve not once wandered in.

Today however, I had a reason.

I wanted to test out the new Leica SL and the Vario-Elmar-SL 24-90/2.8-4-ASPH. I also wanted to see how my prized lens The Legendary Summicron-APO 50/2 fared when mounted onto the SL via an adapter.

The plan was simple: walk through the theme park until I reached the end, then switch lenses and walk back to the entrance.

I managed to walk to the end of the park leisurely with the zoom attached, but ten minutes into switching lenses and retracing my steps, it started to pour with rain. And not just any rain – the type of rain that causes flash floods which sweep people away.

Knowing my SL was waterproof I decided to keep shooting. The problem was that I had to switch back to the zoom lens as the M lenses do not share the same weather resistance that the new line of SL lenses boast.

So much for the plan. Most of the images seen below were taken with the Vario-Elmar-SL. A few of them were taken with the 50APO. Can you tell which are which?

Despite almost drowning, I had a fun time at what I like to call “The Creepiest Theme Park on Earth” (see images). I hear Haw Par Villa was messed up in its heyday, but it’s even worse now that it’s fallen into disrepair.

Oh, and as for the weather sealing on the camera…well let’s just say it’s more water resistant than I am.

Leica SL HawPawVilla1

Leica SL HawPawVilla2

Leica SL HawPawVilla3

Leica SL HawPawVilla4

Leica SL HawPawVilla5

Leica SL HawPawVilla6

Leica SL HawPawVilla7

Leica SL HawPawVilla8

Leica SL HawPawVilla9

Leica SL HawPawVilla10

Leica SL HawPawVilla11

Leica SL HawPawVilla12

Leica SL HawPawVilla13

Leica SL HawPawVilla14

Leica SL HawPawVilla15

Leica SL HawPawVilla16

Leica SL HawPawVilla17

Leica SL HawPawVilla18

Leica SL HawPawVilla19

Leica SL HawPawVilla20

Leica SL HawPawVilla21

Leica SL HawPawVilla22

Leica SL HawPawVilla23

Leica SL HawPawVilla24

Leica SL HawPawVilla25

Leica SL HawPawVilla26

Leica SL HawPawVilla27

Leica SL HawPawVilla28

Leica SL HawPawVilla29

Leica SL HawPawVilla30

Leica SL HawPawVilla31

Leica SL HawPawVilla32

Leica SL HawPawVilla33

Leica SL HawPawVilla34

Leica SL HawPawVilla35

Leica SL HawPawVilla36

Leica SL HawPawVilla37

Leica SL HawPawVilla38

Leica SL HawPawVilla39

Leica SL HawPawVilla40

Leica SL HawPawVilla41

Leica SL HawPawVilla42

Leica SL HawPawVilla43

Leica SL HawPawVilla44

Leica SL HawPawVilla45

Leica SL HawPawVilla46